Cathedrals
(and churches) have historically been regarded as places of refuge, calm and
contemplation. As such I believe that they should be accessible to all – places
we can pause to think, suck up history and enjoy the calm. So why are some
cathedrals slapping on whacking great admission charges?
Today I’m
looking at a few of the Cathedrals that charge admission fees and others that
don’t, looking at their reasoning behind their decisions.
I love the
tranquillity of cathedrals, their amazing history and architecture and often
stunning stained glass windows, and have visited a fair few.
My local
cathedral, Rochester, Kent, does not charge admission and states on its website
that it is “committed to free entry”, which I believe is the correct stance. If
you’d like an audio tour it costs just £1 each, and whilst donations are
welcome, there is no obligation to pay to enter.
In
contrast, my next nearest cathedral, Canterbury, charges £9.50 for adults and
£6.50 for under 18s, unless you are attending a service. I used to like to ‘pop
in’ when in the area to light a candle (giving a donation) and pause for a bit,
but with current charges, it’s not longer feasible to do this on a regular
basis.
I love
Chichester Cathedral, where admission is free, with a statement on their
website declaring that they “do not charge as we believe this beautiful
building should be available for all” I quite agree. It’s a great building,
manned by some friendly volunteers and well worth a visit.
Meanwhile a
recent visit to Norwich Cathedral proved a bit odd. On the website it clearly
states that there is no admission charge, although donations are welcome. This
statement was repeated by a lovely lady in the atrium on our arrival. However,
as we entered the main cathedral, we were confronted with a prominent sign
declaring a ‘suggested donation’ of £5 per person and treated to an icy stare
from an individual behind a counter, defying us to pass without paying.
Although we gave a donation, it was a sum that we felt reflected the extremely
short visit that we were able to make that day.
Finally, if
you don’t mind paying a hefty admission fee, then take a trip to York Minster.
Charging a whopping £14 (yes that is £14) per adult to visit the Minster and
Tower (£9 for Minster only), it could prove an expensive day if there are a few
of you. The York Minster website explains that the cathedral costs “£20,000 per
day to run”. Are they serious? However, the website also says that it’s free to
enter to light a candle, although I don’t know how this works in practice, and
admission is free to York residents, so it’s only visitors to York that get ‘stung’.
I realise
that as historic buildings, cathedrals require a certain amount of upkeep and
maintenance, but there are alternative ways to raise funds without introducing
a hefty admission charge, as many of the free ones demonstrate. If I visit a
‘free’ cathedral I always make a donation and am sure many others do too. Many
cathedrals have tearooms and shops creating income, and I consider certain
‘paid for’ events acceptable.
I am
certainly far less likely to visit a cathedral that demands a set charge, which
means that they get no funds from myself, or like-minded people, whereas if I
could just choose to donate, I would visit and do just that. Cathedrals really
should be usable by all, whether you can pay to go in or not.
What do you
think? comments@shoppersjoy.co.uk
Hi SJ.
ReplyDeleteThis is an interesting post - thank you.
From my own point of view, I'm not religious, but am very interested in the history and architecture, and am more than happy to pay entry to the custodians as I'm basically being a tourist.
I'm not sure if it's still done, but in many places it used to be the custom to give free entrance but then charge for a photography permit - effectively only charging tourists for entry.